Opinions and ideas

Some people express opinions.

Some people express ideas.

Often we find ourselves confronted by one or the other. Both may cause a conversation but the tone of the conversation is a different one. Of course the intention with which both were uttered influences the flow of the conversation - on the other hand some people treat ideas and opinions the same way offering only one possible tone in shades and variations.

 

Some people express an opinion to simply utter it.

Some people express an opinion to express their understanding of a certain subject.

Some people express their opinion to start a conversation.

Some people express their opinion to make others agree.

Some people express their opinion to be told how good it is to be of that opinion.

Some people express an opinion because they are proud of forming an opinion/ this opinion.

Some people express an opinion to express an opinion.

Some people express an idea, as various as the reasons to express it might be, wether it represents an opinion or not, some people present an idea (which is nonetheles expressed).

 

Some people need time to figure out which is which.

Some people express an opinion as  idea.

Some people express an idea as opinion.

Some people need to figure out which is which.

Some people figure out which is which by expressing something that might be an opinion in the future, something that might become or remain an idea, something that might become a possible opinion.

_____________________________________________________________________________

Some people stop to express opinions.

Some people stop to express ideas.

Some people stop to express something that might become either.

Some people stop to express something that may become neither.

Some people stop to express something that could look like an opinion.

Some people stop to express something that could look like an idea.

Some people stop to express something that could appear as a possible idea or opinion.

___________________________________________________________________________

Confusion comepleted... Knowledge won...

One more.

 

Some people expect one to know they express an opinion.

Some people expect one to know they express an idea.

Some people expect one to know they express an possible idea or opinion.

Some people expect one to know they express either.

Some people expect one to know they express neither.

Some people expect one to know they stop to express...

__________________________________________________________________________

Confusion completed or Knowledge gained...

One more.

 

Some expect to be expected to express an opinion.

Some expect to be expected to express an idea.

Some expect to be expected to express a possible idea or opinion.

Some expect to be expected to express either.

Some expect to be expected to express neither.

Some expect to be expected to stop expressing an opinion.

Some expect to be expected to stop expressing an idea.

Some expect to be expected to stop expressing a possible idea or opinion.

Some expect to be expected to stop expressing either.

Some expect to be expected to stop expressing neither.

____________________________________________________________________________

 

...

 

___________________________________________________________________________

Some people express nothing.        What signifies nothing?

Some people express themselves.      Who knows him/ or herself in all shades?

Some people express society's thoughts and rules.   What society? What definition?

Some people express opinions.           Formed by themselves or ....

Some people express ideas.                Formed by themselves or ...

_______________________________________________________________________________

.

.

.

prickly pear prickly pear we all dance around the prickly pear

(nursery rhyme)

 

To leave a comment, please sign in with
or or

Comments (45)

  1. greunie

    Interestingly defensive.

    January 04, 2016
    1. yayuki

      Maybe… I was originally aiming for oberservative neutral… Did you ever see a child decide to interact less because it is told that observations made are wrong when it is actually the reprimanders that don’t get it? Unfortunately it is not only children, one observes it more and more, but at such a young age it makes you think Arrrrgh

      January 06, 2016
      1. wirelessguru1

        greunie hates to debate.

        January 06, 2016
        1. yayuki

          what makes you think that?

          January 06, 2016
          1. wirelessguru1

            I read it somewhere here…

            January 06, 2016
  2. wirelessguru1

    I express the truth.

    January 04, 2016
    1. yayuki

      what you consider it to be ;-)

      January 06, 2016
      1. wirelessguru1

        The truth is not lying.

        January 06, 2016
        1. yayuki

          Didn’t say you were…. Is there one truth? Of course there is one truth for one fact but opinions/ideas arent facts…

          January 06, 2016
          1. wirelessguru1

            Well, there is the one (1) truth.
            +1 (Neo)

            January 06, 2016
            1. yayuki

              oh no don’t neo me Guess it depends on whether you consider new insights on subjects additions or negations of truths.

              January 06, 2016
            2. wirelessguru1

              What do you mean by new subjects!?
              Don’t go hedgehog on Me now!!!

              January 06, 2016
            3. yayuki

              January 06, 2016
  3. wirelessguru1

    In terms of new insights, they just further clarify the truth.

    January 06, 2016
    1. yayuki

      they do and sometimes they make it untrue

      January 06, 2016
      1. wirelessguru1

        Like how do they make it untrue!?
        Give Me a specific example and not just BS!!!

        January 06, 2016
        1. yayuki

          am thinking …

          January 06, 2016
          1. wirelessguru1

            Well, that’s a good thing that you are finally thinking now…

            January 06, 2016
            1. yayuki

              I have a lot philosophical stuff in mind but you need tons of definitions and stuff… How about a fact example… We talked about homos right… Well I tried to because of your post. So do you remeber some years backwards they found that skeleton they considered to close another gab.

              January 06, 2016
            2. wirelessguru1

              I don’t know what a gab is!
              But if you are referring to the theory of evolution that is BS and not the truth, so any new insights on that will only further prove that evolution is BS.

              January 06, 2016
            3. yayuki

              don’t jump conversations hedgehoggy… I like talking to her and people can’t see whether they are talked to or others… I don’t want to disturb her with chitchat

              January 06, 2016
            4. wirelessguru1

              Look hedgehog, I AM not stopping you from talking to anyone here!
              Either case, how do you talk without “chitchat”!?

              January 06, 2016
            5. yayuki

              You of all people don’t believe in evolutuion :shakes head: No I was on to that it is a truth that a human skeleton is a human skeleton right? So the addition was that it looked like a so called homo xy skeleton and seemed to explain a certain development of the bones (which is a theory). Only it turned out to be a case of illness that deforms the bone, which of course makes one wonder about all these homos… At the end they desided it was better to accept it was an ape with a disease that deformed the bone, yet, it is a fact that the bones are still registered as human.

              January 06, 2016
            6. wirelessguru1

              Hello, hello, I AM God, so why would I believe in evolution!?
              IS ANY BODY HOME!!!???

              January 06, 2016
            7. wirelessguru1

              Also, a “homo” skeleton is NOT necessarily a human skeleton!!!

              January 06, 2016
            8. wirelessguru1

              In other words, not all homo species are humans!

              January 06, 2016
            9. yayuki

              I didn’t say you were now I am talking to you you know…

              January 06, 2016
            10. yayuki

              Big hedgehog in the sky with crows LOL Did you get the trutlh example or did you just loose interest?

              January 06, 2016
            11. wirelessguru1

              Hello, hello, is anybody home!!!???

              January 06, 2016
            12. wirelessguru1

              That was a LOUSY example at best, so no, you have yet to offer us an example!!!

              January 06, 2016
            13. yayuki

              Well scientifically by definition all that includes homo means that it is human… Literature played with it too like in homo faber…

              January 06, 2016
            14. This comment has been deleted
            15. wirelessguru1

              No, no, no! Not all homos are/were humans, so no wonder you are a scientific MORON, by definition!

              January 06, 2016
            16. wirelessguru1

              You should stick to poetry and/or philosophy or whatever you call your hedgehog language!!!

              January 06, 2016
            17. yayuki

              homo, hominis m. human. Singular. 1. Fall (Nominativ),

              January 06, 2016
            18. wirelessguru1

              January 07, 2016
  4. wirelessguru1

    ..and if you were referring to this (http://yayukilosophy.thoughts.com/posts/can-humankind-develop-at-all) thread when you said “homos”, it clearly showed Me your confusion about “evolution”!

    January 06, 2016
    1. yayuki

      no no no you where the one posting that new homo xxx found…

      January 06, 2016
      1. wirelessguru1

        Well, if you are referring to this (http://wirelessguru1.thoughts.com/posts/what-s-with-all-of-these-extinct-homos) thread, it clearly shows that evolution is BS!

        January 06, 2016
        1. yayuki

          The point is that the skeleton can only be human or not, it can’t be both. In this example there is one truth. Yet, the scientists decided it is both and not related to the development of the bone structure. So there is a skeleton that doesn’t exist lying in a box and it is a scientific truth. While I think a scientific truth mostly just represents a opinion I still saw the skeleton when they presented the new homo.

          January 06, 2016
          1. wirelessguru1

            No way!
            Science has theories not truth!
            WAKE UP!!!

            January 07, 2016
            1. yayuki

              Are you actually denying that a skeleton of a human is a skeleton of a human? A skeleton of an ape is a skeleton of an ape, right. So what scientist call does not change the truth, which was my point but the added knowledge changes what is called a truth. Since truth is an abstract idea that is simply given a name, we could call truth mplovl and define it new in that way truth is changeable. The way people go it seems we are developing in a way that people run around like disorientated sheep looking for stable things until they find one. So it does not matter if evolution is the one truth it is the truth accepted by society. A simple matter of terms. So there is one truth and there is not one truth at the same time on different levels of definition. Add to that the subject of subjectivity and we might as well say that there is one truth for one person. All truth exists under influence of human thought so religion asks for a truth outside of human thought. So we end up talking about a x still being x when it is not called x and whether the name is an assential part of it and whether it is important for a thing to be seen/heard/felt by someone to exist.

              January 08, 2016
            2. wirelessguru1

              No, no, no! The skeleton of a HOMO is not necessarily the skeleton of a human! WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

              January 08, 2016
            3. wirelessguru1

              ..and yes, you definitely a disorientated sheep! LOL!!!

              January 08, 2016
    2. yayuki

      What kind of example would you like? All you need is a truth that by additional knowledge normally after a more or less big amount of time turned out to be not true. Normally the definition is altered. In etymology there is ether now we call it air…. I’ll think about a good one, I’m really tired…. What do hedgehogs like you do when their tired but can’t sleep?

      January 06, 2016
      1. wirelessguru1

        Obviously you have no examples.

        January 07, 2016